Asset Risk Dashboard
Illustrative qualitative risk rankings retained from the baseline template; the six-hazard financial and recovery results are calculated from the warehouse model.
Component shares are based on combined annualized direct loss (AAL) after renormalizing all hazards to the earthquake replacement-cost basis.
30-year individual-option screening results; option overlaps are not removed. Not a combined investment package.
Warehouse component damage visualization
Interactive 3D building damage
Modelled damage fractions by storey and Uniformat system, driven by Request_225 Q25 and qsample results. Geometry is a reusable illustrative two-storey building model, not a measured survey of this asset.
View simplified two-storey damage schematic
Interactive two-storey schematic derived from compStoreyDir.csv and the 15 Q25/qsample pairs per hazard. Building proportions are schematic; this is not a geometric digital twin.
Leading component fragilities at selected intensity
Damage-state composition by storey
DS1–DS5 are the five primary state positions in the Q25 files. Display is based on sampled damaged quantities, not costs.
Financial exposure & investment potential
Single-storey industrial warehouse · Six hazards · Ottawa, ON · EQ-normalized replacement basis
Across all six modeled hazards
Equivalent to 4.129% of $20,124,900 EQ replacement value per year
Screened interventions; combined post-mitigation loss not recalculated
View the 16 selected positive-return options and calculation
| Hazard | Option | Cost | Direct benefit (30 yr) | Other benefits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FL | B20-Exterior Enclosure | $5,266 | $8,459,950 | $6,066 |
| EQ | B20-Exterior Enclosure | $11,226 | $3,280,070 | $0 |
| EQ | engineering + permit | $40,250 | $0 | $688,357 |
| EQ | B10-Superstructure | $7,156 | $302,130 | $0 |
| EQ | D30-HVAC | $4,446 | $0 | $235,796 |
| FL | Study | $40,250 | $192,470 | $136 |
| HT | inspection | $14,896 | $0 | $133,974 |
| FL | Total Loss | $50,956 | $150,497 | $0 |
| HL | financing | $14,896 | $0 | $89,780 |
| EQ | inspection | $40,250 | $0 | $113,694 |
| EQ | Study | $40,250 | $80,948 | $21,440 |
| WD | D30-HVAC | $116 | $13,100 | $34,491 |
| EQ | financing | $40,250 | $0 | $75,125 |
| EQ | A10-Foundations | $4,769 | $38,629 | $0 |
| FL | financing | $40,250 | $0 | $41,064 |
| FL | E10-Equipment | $2,062 | $2,328 | $0 |
Financial exposure by planning horizon
Loss thresholds with a 10% probability of exceedance. These are not cumulative losses.
| Hazard | Annual expected loss | 10% in 5 years | 10% in 30 years | Full recovery, 5 / 30 yr* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earthquake | $255,841 | $3,782,377 | $20,124,900 | 183.1 / 758.0 days |
| Flood | $397,499 | $5,483,335 | $8,399,395 | 20.5 / 39.1 days |
| Wind | $29,369 | $727,454 | $4,230,837 | 42.6 / 67.3 days |
| Extreme temperature | $7,448 | $48,842 | $78,589 | 38.9 / 48.4 days |
| Hail | $137,136 | $3,320,343 | $8,205,710 | 220.6 / 397.0 days |
| Fire | $3,744 | $0 | $0 | 0.0 / 0.0 days |
Recovery is time to full functional recovery, not operational downtime. Loss and recovery statistics are not necessarily paired. Hazard-specific exceedance thresholds cannot be added together.
What drives the loss?
Top five system-level contributors to annual expected repairable loss. Detailed component records remain available in the export.
Component allocations exclude collapse and total-loss realizations; these outcomes remain separate. Attribution is calibrated to MARS annualized system losses.
Financial basis & traceability
Annual loss is an undiscounted expected physical loss. Reported losses use model-input currency and price basis; no future inflation escalation is applied. A formal business case needs a valuation date, discount rate and explicit investment horizon.
Replacement-cost QA: The EQ and FL runs use the $20.1249M reference. WD, HT, HL and FR monetary results have been multiplied by their respective EQ-to-source-replacement-cost ratios. Recovery times and damage fractions are unchanged.
What drives loss and recovery?
From a direct loss perspective the biggest contributor to Earthquake is Total Loss, the biggest contributor to Flood is D50-Electrical, the biggest contributor to Wind is B30-Roofing, respectively. In some rare, but catastrophic scenarios total loss is a big contributor to one or more of the hazards exposed. Overall structural collapse or other irreparable conditions can both lead to this outcome. Retrofiting structure can be costly, and it is recommended to examine the total loss category in more detail to devise effective mitigation solutions.
Cost Driver by Component Class
{HazardSelectedOption}
Recovery Bottleneck by Task
{HazardSelectedOption}
Rare-event consequence
Rare Events - 5 year horizon 95th percentile
Rare Events - 30 year horizon 95th percentile
Annualized and tail-risk metrics
Source values retained from the fallback report for 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30-year horizons. Combined 30-year expected loss: $2,016,542.
Loss Metrics for Acute Hazards
| Hazard | PML (100-yr) | PML (500-yr) | AEP (1% annual exceedance) | OEP (1% annual exceedance) | TVaR-99% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earthquake | $0.00M | $2.64M | $0.00M | $0.00M | $3.33M |
| Flood | $0.00M | $2.27M | $0.00M | $0.00M | $1.55M |
| Wind | $0.00M | $0.00M | $0.00M | $0.00M | $0.00M |
Acute Downtime Metrics (days)
| Hazard | DT100 | DT200 | DT500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earthquake | 19 days | 19 days | 54 days |
| Flood | 6 days | 18 days | 99 days |
| Wind | 10 days | 15 days | 21 days |
Resilience options and value
| Rank | Horizon | Mitigation option | Target system / component | Category | Overall value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 yr | Harden B20-Exterior Enclosure components under FL for 30-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | B20-Exterior EnclosureFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$5,266Low Financial benefit$8,459,950Moderate Downtime benefit$6,066High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 2 | 30 yr | Harden B20-Exterior Enclosure components under EQ for 30-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | B20-Exterior EnclosureFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$11,226Low Financial benefit$3,280,070Moderate Downtime benefit$0High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 3 | 30 yr | Harden D30-HVAC components under HL for 30-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | D30-HVACFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$0Low Financial benefit$3,010,127Moderate Downtime benefit$16High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 4 | 5 yr | Harden B20-Exterior Enclosure components under FL for 5-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | B20-Exterior EnclosureFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$5,085Low Financial benefit$890,222Moderate Downtime benefit$638High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 5 | 30 yr | Expedite post-EQ recovery/process of engineering + permit for 30-yr horizon.Operational Consideration | engineering + permitFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Operational Consideration | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$40,250Low Financial benefit$0Moderate Downtime benefit$688,357High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 6 | 5 yr | Harden B20-Exterior Enclosure components under EQ for 5-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | B20-Exterior EnclosureFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$2,159Low Financial benefit$345,155Moderate Downtime benefit$0High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 7 | 5 yr | Harden D30-HVAC components under HL for 5-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | D30-HVACFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$0Low Financial benefit$316,750Moderate Downtime benefit$2High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 8 | 30 yr | Harden B10-Superstructure components under EQ for 30-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | B10-SuperstructureFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$7,156Low Financial benefit$302,130Moderate Downtime benefit$0High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 9 | 30 yr | Harden E30-Contents components under EQ for 30-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | E30-ContentsFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$0Low Financial benefit$269,530Moderate Downtime benefit$0High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
| 10 | 30 yr | Harden E40-Inventory components under EQ for 30-yr horizon.Asset Hardening | E40-InventoryFrom the submitted hazard-specific mitigation register | Asset Hardening | High Value |
Original qualitative option ratings retained from the source report. Cost$0Low Financial benefit$237,275Moderate Downtime benefit$0High Safety benefit$0Moderate | |||||
Basis, confidence and update path
How the Evidence Improves the Results
This record distinguishes supplied facts, external hazard information, KR assumptions and calculated results. Confidence levels reflect user selections, model inference, or the documented template defaults.
Hazard basis
Multi-hazard event information and the selected climate horizon define the frequency and intensity of earthquake, flood and wind demands.
Asset definition
The report configuration identifies a Baseline Plus assessment. Asset-specific attributes are used where available; remaining fields should be verified before external decision use.
Performance model
MARSP translates hazard demand and asset characteristics into probabilistic damage, loss, disruption and recovery outcomes.
Update path
Drawings, engineering studies, BIM, BCR/PCA findings or verified component information can replace broader assumptions without changing the reporting structure.
Basis and Confidence
| Model element | Basis used in this assessment | Confidence | Effect on results | Record type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard demand | Location- and scenario-based earthquake, flood and wind information. | High | Supports probabilistic annual and scenario consequence metrics. | External hazard dataCalculated |
| Asset identity and location | Asset name, address and assessment configuration embedded in the report. | High | Defines the assessed asset and applicable hazard context. | Client / project data |
| Building and contents characteristics | Asset representation based on the selected assessment scope and available project evidence. | Medium | Controls component vulnerability, replacement cost, damage drivers and recovery tasks. | Project evidenceKR interpretation |
| Damage and vulnerability relationships | Performance-based component and system relationships applied to the represented asset. | Medium | Produces probabilistic damage and loss distributions; can be refined with detailed engineering analysis. | KR modelCalculated |
| Recovery and disruption | Repair, utility and impedance logic linked to simulated damage states. | Medium | Supports reoccupancy, functional recovery and downtime interpretation. | KR modelCalculated |
| Resilience options | Option costs and benefits associated with the represented model. | Medium | Suitable for comparison and scoping; detailed design and cost validation remain with the project team. | KR analysis |
Structured data package
Configure a Structured Data Package
1. Select information to include
2. Select file format
No data are generated or downloaded from this sample report.
Kinetica Risk
Engineering Insight. Delivered as Data.
Kinetica Risk translates physical hazard and engineering evidence into structured, decision-ready information for asset owners and operators.