Environment and Climate Change Canada Lab Facilities
Multi-hazard analytics for mission-critical facilities, as dashboards and workflow-ready datasets.
Mission-critical facilities | Multi-hazard analytics | Portfolio-to-asset drill down | Workflow-ready outputs | ASTM E3429 compliant
One of the ECCC critical facilities
Kinetica Risk supported Environment and Climate Change Canada’s (ECCC) real property and facility management team with multi-hazard analytics for three regionally important facilities selected for their mission criticality and diverse hazard exposure. The work was designed to translate facility- and asset-level risk into structured outputs that could support routine planning, budgeting, and resilience decisions rather than sit apart as a one-time study.
The Challenge
The selected facilities support critical and irreplaceable operations, while also facing different hazard environments and varying building conditions. For ECCC, the challenge was not only understanding physical risk, but doing so in a way that could support continuity of essential functions and fit within existing asset-management processes such as building condition assessments, annual maintenance budgeting, and capital planning.
What we delivered
Kinetica Risk delivered:
Three facility-level portfolio dashboards with linked drill-down to asset-level views
Twenty-eight asset dashboards to support more detailed review of asset-specific risk and mitigation opportunities
Integration-ready datasets formatted to ECCC’s requested structure for downstream use in existing business tools
Asset categorization aligned with the asset management data already used in ECCC’s planning workflows
Risk breakdowns, mitigation options, and cost-benefit outputs to support maintenance and capital decision-making
Traceable deliverables aligned with ASTM E3429-24, inlcuding provenance files.
Portfolio interactive dashboard - summary view
PowerBI ingested asset risk register
Function recovery panel
Decision value
The result was a self-consistent set of risk insights across hazards, delivered in a form that could be directly used by the client’s existing workflow. Rather than producing a standalone report with limited afterlife, the project translated hazard risk into digestible, traceable planning inputs compliant with ASTM E3429 that could support maintenance decisions, capital investment discussions, and resilience planning for critical functions. This also helped reduce the risk of knowledge loss as internal roles and leadership change over time, because the outputs were structured for reuse rather than one-off interpretation.
PowerBI ingested risk driver by asset
PowerBI ingested mitigation option cost-benefit summary
The level of analytical detail was matched to existing building condition information, helping ensure that the work could be adopted without forcing a new planning logic on the client.